Our global freight forwarding network keeps our customers freight moving across the world.

Sinolines and Antong combination a formidable rival for forwarders in Asia

Freight forwarders could face a changing competitive landscape in China and intra-Asia shipping: Sinotrans Container Lines (Sinolines) has moved to take control of Antong Holdings, combining one of China's major domestic container logistics networks with an international liner. On Wednesday, China Merchants Energy Shipping (CMES) informed the Shanghai Stock Exchange that its subsidiary Sinolines now held 14.94% of the shares of Antong, the holding company of Quanzhou Ansheng Shipping, making it the Shanghai-listed company's largest individual shareholder. Together with its affiliates, China Merchants Group holds 24.84% of Antong's shares. In 2020, Antong, founded by the Guo family, came under state control after financial mismanagement resulted in a state-sponsored bailout involving the China Merchants group. A previous attempt by CMES to take over Antong in May 2025 failed, as market conditions shifted. Now Sinolines has proposed an early re-election of Antong's board and amendments to its articles of association. Its nominees, together with those put forward by China Merchants Port, account for more than half of the proposed board. If shareholders approve the proposals and the nominees take office, Sinolines will replace Fujian Zhaohang Logistics Management Partnership as Antong's controlling shareholder, while China Merchants Group will become the ultimate controller. The transaction is expected to unify Sinotrans' international container shipping network and Antong's domestic container and multimodal logistics operations. CMES said the group intended to integrate domestic and international businesses to build an end-to-end logistics network. Antong's core business is container multimodal transport, with a network spanning waterway, road, and rail services. Sinolines, by contrast, is primarily a liner operator focused on intra-Asia services. Sinolines has an owned fleet of 30,553 teu, which could more than double, as Antong owns 53,994 teu. Ship numbers apart, the combination could allow China Merchants to offer a more integrated product and, for shippers that need separate providers for domestic positioning, port handling, and ocean transport, such a model could be attractive. For freight forwarders, this creates a potential new competitor, and one with greater control over the underlying transport assets. The impact is likely to be most pronounced for forwarders handling China-origin cargo, particularly where domestic transport and ocean freight are bundled into a single service. One forwarder told The Loadstar: "Sinotrans' logistics and forwarding activities already compete for some of the same shipper accounts served by independent forwarders. Greater control over Antong could give the group additional tools with which to compete." Another added: "A more integrated operation could potentially offer aggressive end-to-end rates to major shippers. That could put pressure on forwarders whose value proposition is largely based on combining ocean freight with inland transportation." And the effect could extend beyond China. Sinotrans has been expanding its international container network, while Antong has also been exploring ways to link its domestic and international operations. The two complementary asset bases therefore provide a foundation for a broader intra-Asia logistics proposition.

If AI starts making the decisions, what happens to the TMS?

For more than twenty years, the transport management system has been at the heart of freight forwarding. Whether CargoWise, Magaya, Descartes, or another, the TMS is where operational decisions are made, shipments are managed, and data is stored. Winning the TMS battle has meant becoming the freight forwarder's operating system. But, as ever with tech, things change, not least with the onset of AI. As the industry moves beyond chatbots and document extraction towards AI that can book shipments, resolve exceptions, and make operational decisions, a more fundamental question is emerging: if AI decides what to do next, what exactly is left for the TMS? Wherever operational decisions are made will become the most valuable piece of software in the forwarding stack. If AI chooses the carrier, plans the routing, responds to disruption, and instructs other systems what to do, value may shift from the software that records transactions towards the software that makes decisions. And the industry is beginning to divide into competing camps. WiseTech Global has so far taken one path: rather than separating AI from the TMS, it has embedded AI capabilities throughout CargoWise, adding features ranging from document classification and compliance to workflow automation and AI Expert. CargoWise itself is becoming increasingly intelligent, rather than relying on a separate AI layer. But others see the future very differently. A new generation of technology companies argues that intelligence no longer needs to sit inside the transport management system at all. Project44, for example, believes the future lies in what it describes as an execution layer. Rather than replacing existing TMSs, Project44 is connecting them. Its platform links transport management systems, ERP software, carrier networks, and external data sources into a single logistics graph, allowing AI to orchestrate work across multiple systems. In that model, no single TMS needs to own every workflow. Instead, it becomes one connected component within a much larger software ecosystem. And there is another emerging philosophy: start-up 5U AI, which has recently raised $3.2m in pre-seed funding, has deliberately built its platform to work alongside transport management systems rather than replace them. CEO Yagiz Abik said replacing a TMS was "a two-year migration project", while the immediate opportunity lay in automating the work itself. "Our workers treat the TMS as the system of record, whichever one it is," he told The Loadstar. "We've integrated with systems most Silicon Valley companies have never heard of, because that's the reality of European freight." However, Mr Abik believes that balance will shift as AI takes on more operational work. "Value migrates to the execution layer," he said. "When AI does the work and captures not just the data but the reasoning behind it, the question of which database stores the record matters less than which system does the job and holds the intelligence." The view challenges one of the long-held assumptions of freight software. If AI becomes the primary interface through which operators quote shipments, respond to customers, and make operational decisions, the TMS could increasingly become the system that records and executes those decisions, rather than the place where competitive advantage is created. Meanwhile, FreightSuite has taken perhaps the boldest position of all. Rather than building AI on top of a TMS, it has created an AI-native platform from the ground up, arguing that legacy systems were never designed for autonomous operations. Robert Petti, founder of Prompt Global, believes the industry's real differentiator will not be whether AI sits inside or outside the TMS, but whether it has access to high-quality operational data, business context, and robust governance. In his view, companies risk becoming distracted by architecture when the harder challenge is giving AI the information it needs to make reliable decisions. That may prove to be the industry's biggest challenge. Few global freight forwarders operate a single technology platform. Most rely on combinations of transport management systems, customs software, warehouse management systems, finance applications, visibility providers. and customer portals. Whatever model ultimately prevails, AI will need to work across fragmented technology estates rather than inside a single application. Software vendors have competed for decades to become the freight forwarder's operating system - but the next decade will be all about who owns the intelligence.

Questions raised over new US probe into Mexican aviation

A new probe by the US Federal Aviation Agency (FAA) into Mexican aviation safety is raising eyebrows over potential repercussions on cross-border expansion plans of Mexican airlines. The move comes on the heels of a new aviation bilateral between the neighbours that settles discrepancies over Mexico City's Felipe Angeles International Airport (AIFA), the capital's designated airfreight gateway. With Mexican aviation safety again under the spotlight, the FAA sent a questionnaire requesting 339 answers to Mexican aviation authorities, which has already been returned - no details have emerged. Neither the FAA nor Mexico's Civil Aviation Federal Agency (AFAC) or Ministry of Infrastructure, Communications and Transport (SICT) have commented on the matter. If the assessment were to downgrade Mexico's civil aviation framework from Category I, it would put the nation's airlines at a disadvantage with US carriers. They would not lose their traffic rights to serve US markets, but they could not launch new routes or upgrade frequencies or aircraft types on existing routes. Such a downgrade was enacted in May 2021, and lasted more than two years before Category I status was restored. Apparently the big question mark this time is the level of funding for AFAC. In the process of recovering Category I status, the Mexican authorities committed to increasing the regulator's budget, but this funding has allegedly dropped 37% since then. However, Robert Van De Weg, CEO of Mexican cargo airline mas, was unfazed by the FAA's probe. He said: "This is a regular ICAO assessment executed by FAA inspectors. Like for any audit, we need to see the final results but we have full confidence in the Mexican system. "Should there be a downgrade, this would not materially affect our operations. But again, we are quite confident the outcome will be positive," he added. It will take time to find out. The FAA assessment follows safety standards established by the International Civil Aviation Organisation, and the process involves extensive gathering of information and consultations. The assessment comes on the heels of the aviation bilateral agreement signed mid-July which settled a dispute over access to the Mexican capital for US airlines by formally incorporating AIFA into the framework. To relieve chronic congestion at Mexico City's Benito Juarez International Airport (AICM), in 2023 the authorities reduced the number of take-off and landing slots there and banished freighter flights to AIFA, which sparked protests from US carriers about losing slots at AICM and higher costs for freighter operators. US authorities branded the move a violation of the aviation bilateral and imposed a ban on new cross-border routes from Mexico City for Mexican airlines and frequency increases, and revoked 13 route authorisations for them. According to both sides, the updated framework guarantees transparent and equitable access to cargo infrastructure at both AICM and AIFA, and also established a permanent bilateral working group with officials from the FAA and SICT. Mexico's air cargo volumes climbed 5.5% year on year in the first five months of this year, propelled by 8.3% growth in international traffic. Volumes at AIFA rose 11.3%. In June, 48 new air routes were launched in Mexico, 19 of them international, which included flights to Colombia, Brazil, and Spain, as well as to Detroit, Las Vegas, New York, and Los Angeles.